Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-11 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.51 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Galaxy M51 counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little higher pixels density. Galaxy S25 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.