Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-11 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's score of 80.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy M51 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 100% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.