Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a a lot newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.