Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having a score of 87.7 against 78.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Samsung Galaxy M51 is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it is thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy S7 edge has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy M51 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy M51 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 94% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.