Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 87.7 score against 80.1. The Galaxy M51 body is much thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were released with only 5 months difference. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy M51 features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy M51 has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher video resolution and a much better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.