Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Even though Galaxy M51 and Galaxy XCover Pro were released only 7 months apart, Galaxy M51 is a little lighter and a bit thinner.
Galaxy M51 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both count with quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy M51 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 73 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.