Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy M51's score of 87.7. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Galaxy M51 were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M51 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy M51 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.