Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is incredibly newer than the Xperia XZs, it's noticeably heavier and thicker. Xperia XZs features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density.
Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Xperia XZs shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, although it has a worse video quality, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor, a back-facing camera with way less megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in low-light environments.
Galaxy M51 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 features a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 141% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.