Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy M51, getting a 90.1 score against 87.7. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Galaxy M51, we must tell that it is also a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide you all the same operating system features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 has a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.