Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11. Even being the best in this review, we must note that it is also a thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a little greater number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.