Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a score of 87.7 against 81.1. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give all the same operating system features. The Galaxy M51 is a better device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy M51 count with incredibly similar displays, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch, they both have a display of the same size. Galaxy M51 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 64 mega pixels resolution camera and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.