Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a score of 87.7 against 78.1. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy M51's construction is thicker and heavier than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better display pixel density. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.