Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, having a overall score of 88.1 against 76.7. The Apple iPhone X is a much older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, but Apple managed to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone X has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each display inch and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px. Apple iPhone X has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M53 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy M53 5G features a much better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The Galaxy M53 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.