Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 general score. Even being the best we compare here, the iPhone XS is a older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone than Galaxy M53 5G. Apple iPhone XS counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS features a better display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy M53 5G features just a bit better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy M53 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy M53 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.