Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy M53 5G, getting a 77 score against 76.7. The HTC U Ultra is a incredibly older and just a little thicker cellphone than Galaxy M53 5G, but HTC managed to make it a bit lighter anyway. HTC U Ultra has a very superior performance than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
HTC U Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy M53 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a much smaller sensor, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M53 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.