Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, with a general score of 81.3 against 76.7. The LG V35 ThinQ design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, but it's lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixel count per display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy M53 5G features a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.