Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, getting a general score of 81.2 against 76.7. Despite of the fact the LG V40 ThinQ is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G features a really longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and a lot tinier sensor capturing much worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.