Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Galaxy M53 5G, getting an 87.1 score against 76.7. LG Velvet is an older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy M53 5G. The LG Velvet features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a quite larger screen and a just a bit higher pixels amount per screen inch.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a much greater performance than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The LG Velvet shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a lot worse resolution back camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.