Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-07 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, with an 85.5 score against 76.7. Although the Galaxy A51 is extremely older and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, it's construction is still a bit lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a really superior performance than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A51 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.