Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, just a little thicker and heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12, providing you some additional features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little larger display and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy M53 5G has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.