Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Galaxy M53 5G, getting a global score of 86.3 against 76.7. Galaxy S10e's body is somewhat lighter than Galaxy M53 5G, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy M53 5G features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy M53 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing way worse quality videos and images and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.