Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Galaxy M53 5G's overall score of 76.7. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is a better device than Galaxy M53 5G, it must be told that it is also older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior processing power than Galaxy M53 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit better display density.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy M53 5G features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.