Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-04-07 | -- |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 general score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12, providing the user some extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy M53 5G.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy M53 5G's battery lifetime. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.