Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than Galaxy M53 5G, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a much older and thicker cellphone than the Galaxy M53 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter anyway. The Galaxy S9 has a much better processing power than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a better looking display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater number of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a much tinier sensor taking way worse quality photos, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Galaxy S9 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 400 GB. Galaxy M53 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.