Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.2 | -- |
| 2013-04-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.30 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 190 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM28155 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| VideoCore IV GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8, with an 87.1 score against 62.1. The LG Velvet construction is newer, just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8. LG Velvet has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8, because it has a larger screen, way more pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Mega 5.8, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. LG Velvet counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8, because it has 120 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery capacity.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy Mega 5.8, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.