Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-04-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.60 x 3.46 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 410 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3's overall score of 67.9. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 has Android 4.4.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a notably newer device than Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3, although it is somewhat thicker and a little heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Mega 6.3, because it has a bit larger screen, a much higher screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Mega 6.3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Mega 6.3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and 4,5 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Mega 6.3, because it has a 57% more battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Mega 6.3, because it has a much higher (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little more expensive than the Galaxy Mega 6.3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.