Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is slightly better than the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, getting a 98.9 score against 93.3. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Apple iPhone 13 Pro. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra works with Android 13 operating system, and Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.