Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), getting a 98.9 score against 77.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and just a bit thinner than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s, although it is heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a bit better screen density and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a lot higher video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.