Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Google Nexus 6's global score of 81.1. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than the Google Nexus 6's, although it's heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, counting with lots of additional features.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, a little smaller display and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6, because it has a bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better video quality. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more than the Google Nexus 6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.