Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is much newer and a bit thinner than Google Pixel's, although it is also heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a much bigger display, a little higher screen pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processor than Google Pixel, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.