Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 score. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4650mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.