Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but it's a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite higher screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.