Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4, but it is way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.