Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having a overall score of 98.9 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a little bit heavier phone than Google Pixel 4 XL, but both have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count in each screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4 XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.