Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 10.61 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 11.76, which is better than Google Pixel 5's score of 10.61. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Google Pixel 5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a just a bit greater display pixels density, a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 MP resolution, a lot better video quality and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Google Pixel 5 has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 5. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 5, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.