Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 general score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and heavier than Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is still a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 6a has a battery life that's just as good as Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery life, although the Google Pixel 6a has just 4410mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.