Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s score of 82.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a lot better video resolution and a back camera with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.