Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Honor 50 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than the Honor 50 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, so it gives you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots better videos and photos than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.