Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 494 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a bit better than the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's general score of 92.1. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, although it was released many years before.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1280 x 2800 resolution and a little bit lower pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher video resolution and a much higher resolution back camera. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.