Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-08-30 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than HTC U12 Life, getting a 11.76 score against 8.88. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer and just a little thinner than HTC U12 Life's, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 11 version while HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior performance than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than HTC U12 Life, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more memory for games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than HTC U12 Life, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The HTC U12 Life features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 3600mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.