Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's a little thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit features a much better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number in each inch of display and a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and a back camera with a way better resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.