Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than LG K52's global score of 76. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the LG K52 were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is heavier but just a little bit thinner than the LG K52. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than LG K52, because it has a little bit larger display, a much greater display density and a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than LG K52, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG K52, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little longer battery duration than LG K52, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.