Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Titanium and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the LG K61, getting a general score of 98.9 against 77.6. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the LG K61 were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is just a bit thinner but also a little heavier.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG K61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than LG K61, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than LG K61, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better resolution. The LG K61 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K61 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG K61, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.