Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Sky Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the LG K62, with a general score of 11.76 against 9.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and LG K62 were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little thinner but heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than LG K62, because it has a way better count of pixels per inch of display, a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit larger screen. The LG K62 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG K62 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a way better video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
