Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is way newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it is a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
LG V30S ThinQ features a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's display, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2880, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density. LG V30S ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a much more MP back camera and a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.