Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Forged Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Defy (2021), having a 98.9 score against 77.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older phone than the Motorola Defy (2021), but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a much better number of pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Defy (2021) features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.