Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, having a 98.9 score against 87.1. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, but both of them are 0.32inches thick.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 108 MP resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much higher video resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.