Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 92.8. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12, so it counts with some nice extra features. Even being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 20 Pro.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the same 24 frames per second video frame rates and a 108 MP resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro's battery duration is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.