Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 general score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge (2024), but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge (2024), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than Motorola Edge (2024), and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge (2024) features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Motorola Edge (2024), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.