Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a 98.9 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is older, just a little thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower display pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.